Update – IL Judge Strike DTD Torpedo. Torpedo_Striken
Well I can honestly say I’m a little upset with this, but life and the war goes on. The only person who seems to be happy is John Steele. As it stayed up for a while on PACER and I have it on SCRIBD, the information will not die. There was no information as to the reason why it was stricken, but as the IL court has favored the Trolls, it doesn’t surprise me. My other torpedo should have reached the DC court and Prenda by now. As it is in the DC courts, I can only hope the judge is bit more friendly than the IL one. As it takes a strike at 6881 Forensics LLC, I can see what got John’s panties in a bunch. Media Copyright Group, 6881 Forensics, etc.; this is the basis for what gets Prenda and the other Trolls their subpoenas granted. Destroy this and their operation takes a dive. Don’t lose faith and keep telling the Trolls to bring it on. They don’t want a full-out trial, only your money.
Well my latest Declaration (torpedo) was filed in the Illinois court on 11 Jan 12, on case
# 1:11-CV-09064, Pacific Century International LTD., v. John Does 1-31, Prenda Law, Paul Duffy. The torpedo is titled, “Declaration to Rufute Plaintiff’s Declaration of Peter Hansmeier.” The first page is the Notice of Presentment that is a local rule for the IL court.
It isn’t the biggest case (only 31 Does), but as the court had not granted the Troll a subpoena for the ISP subscriber information, I felt this was a good one for a torpedo. My SCRIBD Folder on this case (Complaint, IP Addresses, etc.)This declaration directly refutes the declaration of Peter Hansmeier, Media Copyright Group (MCG), LLC. The declaration of Mr. Hansmeier is central to the case and especially to the granting of a subpoena for ISP subscriber information.
One thing that is new to my declarations is I made the suggestion to the court that they grant a limited subpoena to Plaintiff. The limited subpoena would direct the ISP to safeguard the subscriber information pending a final determination. The final determination would be after the Court interviewed Mr. Hansmeier, MCG. If the court takes my suggestion, this can bring to MCG’s (& Prenda) collection efforts out in the light for all to see. My bet is you will find out that Mr. Hansmeier may have some IT degree and/or training, but nothing that qualifies him as an expert or an unbiased fact witness.
I make the balanced suggestion to the court that a limited form of a subpoena be granted to Plaintiff. This limited subpoena could instruct each ISP to immediately safeguard the subscriber information associated with the Public IP address identified by Mr. Hansmeier. While the subscriber information is being safeguarded, the court can interview Mr. Hansmeier regarding the nature of MCG’s proprietary forensic software and his technical certifications. he court can also determine if joinder of ALL the Doe defendants in this case is appropriate based Mr. Hansmeier providing full details of the swarm participation dates/times for all the Public IP addresses. This information will help the court determine if subscriber information should be released to Plaintiff based on the existing information. I thank the court for hearing this declaration.
I will make some updates to this posts, but for now, take a read and give me some feedback please. I also need to pick a music video to go along with this torpedo.
Something for the Trolls
“Some ships are designed to sink… others require our assistance.”