Tag Archives: Richard Pryor Response

Richard Pryor Response For 2017 – Have A Coke & A Smile And…

For those of you that haven’t followed the antics of BitTorrent (BT) Copyright Trolls since 2010, I will recount one of my early posts and something I coined as the “Richard Pryor Response” (RPR). I will preface this article by … Continue reading

Posted in Richard Pryor Respoinse | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Answering A BT Copyright Troll Summons/Complaint

Caveat – I’m not an attorney and I’m not practicing law. This is simply my thoughts and views based on what I see concerning BitTorrent (BT) Copyright Infringement Trolls. If you decide you need legal advice, please hire a knowledgeable … Continue reading

Posted in Answering A Summons | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 12 Comments

How To Answer A Copyright Troll Summons – Basic Denial

I have been toying with the idea of writing another article on how to do a basic ‘Answer’ (denial) to a complaint/summons from a Copyright Troll.  I don’t want to make it seem like it getting served a summons/complaint is … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

Malibu Media Claims Fabrication Of Evidence And Seeks Sanctions, 2:12-cv-02078 (PA)

I reviewed the declaration/report of Patrick Paige, Computer Forensic Examiner, Computer Forensics LLC, concerning the examination of computer image files belonging to Doe #16, case # 2:12-cv-02078, Malibu Media LLC v. John Does 1, 6, 13, 14, and 16.   Doc … Continue reading

Posted in Keith Lipscomb | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 64 Comments

Keith Lipscomb & Malibu Media – Where Are They Going?

On 23 Mar 13, Troll Jon Hoppe, Maddox, Hoppe, Hoofnagle & Hafey, LLC, filed a written response to the Courts Memorandum/Order, case # 8:13-cv-00360, Malibu Media LLC, v. John Doe, IP address 68.50.250.243.   MM_Response_00360(MD)   This was in response to the … Continue reading

Posted in Keith Lipscomb | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 28 Comments

Update To The “Richard Pryor Response” OR What To Tell The Troll When He Calls

9 January 2016 Update Troll Lowe (WA) recently cited by Feb 2012 Posting “Richard Pryor Response (RPR)” as a reason why he is having trouble getting people to “voluntarily” respond to his inquiries into copyright infringement.  MOTmoreTime_Doc14_01406(WA)   DECL_Lowe_Doc15_01406(WA)   He … Continue reading

Posted in What To Do | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

How To Answer A Summons From A Copyright Troll

As a follow-up piece on what to do when served, I thought it might be a good to provide a “template” answer document.  *** Now I will caution those of you that are considering using such a template.  If you … Continue reading

Posted in Keith Lipscomb | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 11 Comments

What To Do If You Are Served By A Copyright Troll

Respond! With all the recent Prenda Law (Steele Hansmeier Duffy Lutz Saltmarsh…) insanity going on, it has been hard to focus on other Copyright Trolls needing our attention.  The Prenda Law ship is taking on water and the fallout from … Continue reading

Posted in Keith Lipscomb | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 25 Comments

Malibu Media Changes Tactics – Single Does & “Enhanced Surveillance”

It appears Malibu Media is changing its tactics a bit.  Recently in Colorado (and other jurisdictions) people have reported that single John Doe cases were being filed.  These new cases may or may not be directly part of a previous … Continue reading

Posted in Keith Lipscomb | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 18 Comments

Lipscomb Fishing Co., or “Exculpatory Evidence Request”

28 Feb 13 – Update I have been getting a few request for ideas on how to respond to the exculpatory evidence request letters lately.  As previously stated, there is NO legal requirement to reply to the request. Saying that, … Continue reading

Posted in Keith Lipscomb | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 60 Comments